INCLUDE PEOPLE WO DO NOT AGREE.
Over
the years, I have observed that normally at work or even just in our homes
under normal setting; disagreements may arise and generally they arise from two
sources. First it may
be attributed to differences in information and knowledge
and secondly differences over fundamental assumptions or values; and these two
are important sources of learning.
In my
years of practice Strategy and in helping teams to shape the future, I noticed
that many times those with different views are excluded in process initiatives
and planning by leaders and seen as rivals. This outlook may be attributed to many
aspects including fears of stifling ideas, insubordination, and many others
that you may think of; I mean this is no emerging topic.
That
as it may; in the field of visioning and projections, disagreement is viewed as
check and balances and a perfect peer review of expanded ideas. Including people
with different assumptions assists the business unit and organisation to have a
wider perspective on new projects or proposals; this helps to improve as necessary
before launching.
As a leader
or strategist, we should view disagreements as a mechanism to enable the best
possible decision-making. So, if you must learn something today, initiatives
deliberate differences in work place I order to provoke thought; this will ultimately
make decision making more robust. Establish an atmosphere where legitimacy
disagreement is allowed to flourish. Therefore, managing teams includes people
who can express dissenting views yet work towards a common objective.
Comments
Post a Comment